Not saying I’m going Baldwin, but I’m certainly considering it:
Oct
30
2008
30
2008
Jack Hunter Makes The Case For Chuck Baldwin
11 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Steve Skojec
Armchair Commentary, Free of Charge
-
Support This Site
Now Reading
Planned books:
- Great Heresies by Hilaire Belloc
- The Age of Martyrs: Christianity from Diocletian (284) to Constantine (337) by Abbot G. Ricciotti
- What Were the Crusades? by Jonathan Riley-Smith
Current books:
-
The January Dancer by Michael Flynn
Recent books:
- Brave New Family: G.K. Chesterton on Men and Women, Children, Sex, Divorce, Marriage and the Family by Gilbert Keith Chesterton
- Passport by Christopher Blunt
Powered by WordPress | Theme: Aeros 2.0 by TheBuckmaker.com
I went to a Baldwin rally that wasn’t actually a rally. It was actually an alumni weekend for a Baptist college. We snuck out before the altar call after Pastor Baldwin’s sermon. I blogged it.
http://apoloblogology.blogspot.com/2008/10/pros-and-cons-from-chuck-baldwin-rally.html
I disagree with Hunter on a litmus test that doesn’t include abortion, but his thinking and principals are sound.
M. Swain: I’ve felt equally uncomfortable with Baldwin’s Calvinism, and the general wierd revisionist history of the Constitution party. It does seem as if they secretly don’t want Catholics around.
I’m with you guys. There’s always been something about him that bothered me even before I started recognizing these concerns - he seemed too amateurish.
But the arguments made in his favor (and against the main contenders) by Jack Hunter were worth hearing, and could be applied anywhere.
Oddly, most traditional conservatives with a platform aren’t playing up the abortion issue this year.
“Oddly, most traditional conservatives with a platform aren’t playing up the abortion issue this year.”
Which is dereliction of duty on their part, especially since Obama and the Democratic Congress have promised to pass the Freedom of Choice Act as soon as possible.
Which is dereliction of duty on their part
It would certainly seem so. I am getting the feeling that most of our allies are traditionally conservative almost entirely on issues of War, economy, and immigration. Abortion is part of the landscape for them, and while it may figure in, it’s not in priority-order.
Not a good sign for the future of the movement, which is poised not just to split, but to shatter.
Changing the status quo won’t come about through voting third party. It will come about through reclaiming the culture. Until that happens (and we’ll likely all be dead by then), no worthy candidate will ever receive enough votes to win a presidential election. Better to vote for one of the viable candidates to prevent the greater evil.
For CT, Baldiwn is the only truly pro-life guy running . . . and he’s just a write in.
“Better to vote for one of the viable candidates to prevent the greater evil.”
For the rest of our lives I suppose . . . since evil just begets more evil, we’ll just keep voting that way right on into heaven (hopefully, hehe). If the election is just a farce and we’ll only be electing lesser evils, why do we put so much stock into it?
For 1.2 million Americans every year, our government is already the worst ever. They end up all dead. If we’re doomed to just get worse and worse . . .
I am also going to vote for Chuck Baldwin and here is why:
Pastor Baldwin was endorsed by Ron Paul. Ron Paul had the courage to keep donations sent to him from members of Stormfront who merely wish to exercise their Free Speech rights.
Pastor Baldwin and the Constitution Party believe that sinners like homosexuals and drug dealers should be put to death.
Pastor Baldwin believes that the government conspired to kill 3,000 Americans on 9/11.
Pastor Baldwin wants to restore the Constitution to the way it was in the day of George Washington. The Founding Fathers owned slaves, like most Old Testament heroes do.
Pastor Baldwin does not believe that the 16th Amendment was ratified legally, that the NAFTA Superhighway is part of the Globalist Plan for La Raza Mexicans to take over America, and that the CFR and the UN secretly control all but one member (Ron Paul) of Congress.
Pastor Baldwin believes that the treaty signed at Appomattox Court House in 1865 by Robert E. Lee was under duress and therefore not binding.
Unless America remembers YWVH again, America will suffer the fate of Sodom and Gomorrah. McCain and Obama are the same. The only way to stop the Fire&Brimstone is to vote for Pastor Chuck Baldwin.
SECOND LOOK AT BOB BARR!!
Well, SavedByGrace, that settles it then!
America is over.
Baldwin is certainly no Alan Keyes . . . if you have a chance to vote for Keyes, that’s who I’d endorse. I wish he were on the ballot in every state.